Thursday, December 11, 2008

Obama’s Win Didn’t End Racial Stereotyping



Earl Ofari Hutchinson



There is still much talk about how Barack Obama’s White House win demolished negative stereotypes about blacks. That’s wishful thinking. A new study by a team of researchers from several top universities shows that stereotypes about poverty and crime remain just as frozen in time. The study found that much of the public still perceives that those most likely to commit crimes are poor, jobless, and black. The surprise was that the negative racial stereotypes also applied to anyone, no matter their color, who was poor and jobless. If for instance a white commits a crime the odds are that the respondents will reclassify that person as black.
The jumbled mental contortions that many go through to dub a white person black solely on the basis of their income and whether they have been jailed didn’t end there. If a person who was perceived as white was jailed that person was still perceived to be black even after their release. The study did more than affirm that race and poverty and crime are firmly rammed together in the public mind. It also showed that once the stereotype is planted it’s virtually impossible to root out. That’s hardly new either.
In 2003 Penn State University researchers conducted a landmark study on the tie between crime and public perceptions of who is most likely to commit crime. The study found that many whites are likely to associate pictures of blacks with violent crime. This was no surprise given the relentless media depictions of young blacks as dysfunctional, dope peddling, gang bangers and drive by shooters. The bulging numbers of blacks in America’s jails and prisons seem to reinforce the perception that crime and violence in America invariably comes with a young black male face. And it doesn’t much matter how prominent, wealthy, or celebrated a black is. The overkill frenzy feeding on the criminal hijinks of New York Giants wide receiver Plaxico Burress, O.J. Simpson, and the legions of black NFL, NBA stars, Hollywood peronalities, and entertainers who run afoul of the law or are bad behaving further reinforce the negative image of blacks.
There was, however, a mild surprise in the Penn State study. It found that even when blacks didn’t commit a specific crime whites still misidentified the perpetrator as an African-American. University researchers were plainly fascinated by this result. Five years later they wanted to see if that stereotype still held sway. By then Obama’s political ascent was in full trajectory upward. Polls showed that a crushing majority of whites not only said that they would vote for an African-American for president, but that color was not a consideration in how they viewed and voted for a candidate. This appeared to signal a benign sea change in public attitudes on race.
It didn’t. Researchers found that public attitudes on crime and race were unchanged. The majority of whites still overwhelmingly fingered blacks as the most likely to commit crimes, even when they didn’t commit them.
There are two troubling implications in these studies. One is that Obama’s victory was more a personal triumph for him. It did not radically remap racial perceptions, let alone an end to racial stereotyping. A significant percent of whites voted for him and were passionate about him because they were fed up with Bush’s policies, and believed that he would reverse those policies. The vote for him was race neutral. His victory was a tribute to his personal political organization and savvy as well as public fear and frustration about Bush. The second implication is even more troubling. If much of the public still view crime and poverty through narrow racial lens then that will continue to stir public clamor for lawmakers, police and prosecutors to clean the streets of violent criminals, who are almost always seen as African-Americans. This could mean even more gang sweeps, court injunctions, stiff adult prison terms, three strikes laws, and incarceration for teens, the holding of accused teens indefinitely in juvenile jail detention.
Ironically, Obama inadvertently fed the negative perceptions of blacks. In several much publicized talks on the black family, he blasted black men for being missing in action from the home and shirking their family responsibility. It was a well-meaning effort to call attention to the chronic problems of black males and families, but it also gave the impression that black males are dysfunctional. It was a short step from that to conclude that these same men are more likely to be involved in crime than whites.
Obama’s win was a two edged sword. It was as billed a profound historic win, but it also fanned the illusion that racial stereotypes are dead. Now we know better.

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His forthcoming book is How Obama Won (Middle Passage Press, January 2009).

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

I really challenge everyone reading this to read "Diagnosing the Destruction of Young Men". It will open your eyes to the solutions, that Obama has to see for real change to take place! The individual victory was great, but the global victory is far more important!

www.Fighting4Youth.com

梁爵 said...

2019.10.15台北酒店上班就業服務處將於10月15日至18辦徵才酒店工作活動,為所有大學生、上班族想要酒店兼差求職的朋友提供20家知名便服店、禮服店、制服店,共釋出300個酒店打工機會。知名酒店經紀梁小尊/梁曉尊指出,知名台北八大行業為近幾年熱門的酒店小姐產業,在推廣[早脫貧]口號行動之外也與各大知名酒店經紀公司合作提供小姐配套性服務,釋出的酒店兼職職缺並非強迫性,增取更多人力人才,目前市場數據公司民調指出:是求職者普遍年輕群喜愛快速賺錢的方式。

梁爵 said...

2019.11.10台北知名酒店經紀今天(9日)公布10月酒店上班薪資統計,酒店經紀公司全體酒店工作受僱員工每人經常性薪資平均為新台幣9萬3200元,酒店小姐年增4.59%,創近19年同月最高,不過,較能反映景氣的加班工時則已連續6個月呈現負成長。酒店經紀分析:這代表酒店兼差景氣雖持續擴張,但擴張力道趨緩。不過,5月整體加班工時年減0.2小時,已連續6個月呈現負成長,若觀察制服店、便服店、禮服店、鋼琴酒吧、日式酒店、飯局、傳播加班工時更是連續7個月負成長,顯示景氣雖持續擴張,但擴張力道趨緩。台北風俗知名專家說:八大行業跟去年11月比,酒店兼職是減了3小時,可是7月跟去年7月比是減了3.5小時,所以沒有擴大,基本還是景氣擴張力道趨緩,反映出的加班打工減少的現象。

梁爵 said...

2020.02.05根據2019年度調查酒店工作有6成4上班族有意願酒店上班,並盼藉此酒店打工加薪新台幣7萬6000元;除了陪睡接S(性交易)、為客人口爆(口交)顏射等酒店兼差工作受上班族歡迎,曾經酒店上班的知名網紅劉XX、雪XX首度擠進酒店上班在八大行業酒店成績排行榜前3名。酒店經紀今天公布台北風俗「上班族酒店兼職現況調查」,調查顯示,有6成4受訪者有意願酒店兼職,3成6的人擁有大學生酒店兼差酒店上班,4成6受訪者無兼差打算。酒店經紀觀察上班族想要酒店兼差或是已經有兼差工作的原因,主要有希望透過兼差增加收入、白天工作薪水太低必須兼差以及工時彈性自由。

梁爵 said...

2020.05.03酒店工作因武漢肺炎(COVID-19、新冠肺炎)政府提出酒店S疫情紓困方案,但對酒店八大業酒店上班者來說,申請十分困難,更有不少人在過程中打退堂鼓,專門協助八大行業失業女公關的團體「酒店PT與妹仔的日常」就表示,16日公布相關政策以來,他們就持續被退件甚至刁難,一直到28日,他們輔導的200多名酒店打工女公關中,才有第1個人拿到3萬元補助,猶如登天之難,中間的問題、苦水真的不少。「酒店經紀與妹仔的日常」工作人員表示,酒店被勒令停業後,他們就先在臉書粉絲團上,希望各界連署,聲援相對「弱勢」的她(他)們,目前已有3416人支持,其中業界女公關也有1300人。知名酒店經紀梁曉尊/梁小尊說紓困方案16日公布後,不少人去申請時,承辦人都面露難色,甚至有人暗喻:「連你們也來申請?」、「還沒輪到你們吧…」像有的人要求提出勞僱合約、薪資單或是工作證明,小花說在這行其實很多人都拿不出來。有酒店業者感嘆,外界對他們,還是有「次一等人」的歧視,不少人認為從工廠、觀光、餐飲、住宿產業,大家還沒補助到,怎麼輪得到我們?但八大真的很慘,真的很多單親爸爸、媽媽,都快活不下去了。