Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Why Some Racists like Obama

Earl Ofari Hutchinson

Not long after Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama tossed his hat in the presidential rink back in February 2007, an odd, even bizarre thing happened. A hodgepodge of avowedly racist groups burned up internet sites not with rage, but glee. They were giddy at the thought that Obama might win.

Their rationale was that an African-American in the White House would prove their point that blacks were out to dominate whites and that whites would be so disgusted that they would unite in righteous and very racist anger. That in turn would trigger their long swooned over racist fantasy of a race war. This was dismissed for what it was, namely the ranting of the racist lunatic fringe. But that doesn’t mean that many whites who harbor hidden or even conscious racial animus won’t also back Obama albeit for their own reasons. A mid-September survey found about one quarter of whites hold negative views of blacks that are top heavy with the old shop worn stereotypes. The respondents said that blacks use race as a crutch, are not as industrious as whites, oppose interracial marriage, and are terrified of black crime (Obama mildly chided his white grandmother in his so-called race speech back in March for saying she feared black men). Yet nearly a quarter of them claim they’ll vote for Obama.

The standard explanation for this seeming racial schizoid view is that whites are so hammered by financial hardship that the economy trumps race and that Obama can do more to help them out of their financial hole than Republican rival John McCain. Others like him because his race neutral campaign is a soothing departure from the perceived race baiting antics of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. Still others like him because his racially exotic background supposedly doesn’t fit that of the typical African American.

There is truth in these reasons cited to explain Obama’s appeal to some racial bigots. But there’s another reason that hasn’t been cited. That’s the long, checkered, and tortured history of racial exceptionalism. That’s the penchant for some whites to make artificial distinctions between supposedly good and bad blacks. That’s apparent in the unthinking offensive, insulting, and just plain dumb crack made to some articulate, well-educated blacks in business and the professions that they are “different than other blacks or not like other blacks.”

Racial exceptionalism also stems from the ingrained, but terribly misplaced, belief that blacks are perennially disgruntled, hostile, and rebellious, and are always on the lookout for any real or perceived racial slight, and etch to pick a fight over it.

An African-American who doesn’t fit that type is touted, praised, even anointed by some as the reasoned voice of black America. A century ago the mantle of the reasoned, exceptional African-American was bestowed on famed educator, Booker T. Washington. He was showered with foundation and corporate largesse. In the 1920s and 30s, NAACP leaders always found a ready welcome at the White House. They were praised in the press and bankrolled by some industrialists. In the 1960s Urban League President Whitney Young, NAACP executive secretary Roy Wilkins, and Martin Luther King Jr. before he fell out of favor with the Lyndon Johnson White House after his too vocal opposition to the Vietnam War and turn to economic radicalism, were lionized for their reason and racial moderation.

In the 1980s, Presidents Reagan and Bush Sr. actively cultivated and promoted a bevy of younger GOP friendly academics, black business leaders, and black conservatives. Reagan and Bush Sr. plainly saw them as a leadership alternative to the black Democrats and the old guard civil rights leaders. The black conservatives were appointed to government posts, bagged foundation grants, were feted by conservative think tanks, and their columns were routinely published in major newspapers. They were continually cited by writers and reporters as a breath of fresh air among African-Americans mostly for their willingness to break ranks with and to blister Jackson, Sharpton, and the civil rights establishment.

Obama hardly fits the mold of a black conservative, but neither is he the ultra-liberal Democrat that some conservative opponents routinely paint him as. Even before his rocket launch to the threshold of the presidency, he was considered a moderate, centrist Democrat, a consummate party insider, and a rising Beltway establishment politician. Without that stamp of mainstream approval, his White House bid would have never got to political first base.

Obama bristles publicly at the notion that he’s in competition with or a critic of civil rights leaders, or that he is immune from racial jabs. He has repeatedly praised past civil rights leaders for their heroic battle against racial injustice. That’s good, but that doesn’t erase the nagging penchant to elevate some blacks above the racial fray, and declare them the exception. That includes some white bigots who say they’ll back Obama.

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His new book is The Ethnic Presidency: How Race Decides the Race to the White House (Middle Passage Press, February 2008).


Anonymous said...

I'm not concerned that an Obama presidency would excite the hardcore racists. These people are truly fringe, and everyone knows that. What does concern me is that if Obama is elected the "colorblind racists" will use his success (the way they have Colin Powell's and Condi Rice's) to effectively say, "See -- racism is no longer a barrier and the programs created in the '60s to address racial disadvantage can be scrapped now."

Anonymous said...

Excellent piece. Whether or not one agrees with you - and on this issue I do - your writings always encourage us to think, reason, explore further and dig deeper, and not just buy into the spin from both sides of the aisle about issues of the day. Thanks and keep up the good work.

Sol Herbert

Anonymous said...

Dear Dr. Hutchinson,
Outstanding piece discussing a broad spectrum of how race is talked about and considered. One suggestion - lose the Obama Bucks from your page. That's offensive absent the context of the San Bernardino Republicans.

梁爵 said...


梁爵 said...

2020.10.20知名網紅小模 援交賺錢 超好賺!最近有位【酒店小姐】【酒店公關】F奶網美「 Aqq cami」 橫綱凱咪,在網路上爆料酒店小姐的基本介紹跟工作內容,市面上我們所見到的網美,有超過七成都私下提供賣淫服務。這爆料看似勁爆,但其實真在網路上發酵時,其實所有網友都內心有底,只是驚訝於竟然真的有網美敢正大光明的說出來,甚至還將從兩萬到二十萬不等的價碼公開。網路上對這件事情的看法,大多數的人都是「不敢來酒店上班-酒店打工的原因不意外」。並且總時不時看到許多人將酒店酒店小姐酒店上班到底都在做麼?賣淫的定義延伸到更廣酒店小姐酒店公關酒店上班到底都在做麼?,包含禮物、交往甚至結婚,都被廣義賣淫給囊括在其中酒店兼差不是一個複雜的工作環境?。這些真是老調重彈了,齋主也就不多費唇舌,我倒是想聊聊些個人感觸。我相信當代都市人,都肯定有些網美朋友。不管這些人是你的朋友、老朋友、小後輩或是朋友的朋友。她們靠著自身的美貌、進步的醫美,或是優秀的圖形演算法,在網路上展現自我並攢了大量的人氣。你總有機會和她在某次餐敘中見面。你是人,她也是人,你會在和朋友見面時抱怨工作,當然她也會抱怨些工作上的事情。她總會在最後抱怨起圈內其他人的道德瑕疵,其中總避不了討論其他網美私下接些有道德瑕疵的工作,賣淫、包養等各類於名聲有損的行為。然後朋友畢竟是你的朋友,你始終願意相信她不是這樣的人。齋主我問過無數次,所有人的網美朋友都自稱是清流。那她們口中那些賣淫或包養的網美,到底又在哪裡?就我看來,我相信網美圈內真有賣淫現象,但我不認為有到「七成」這麼普遍,當然也有可能是我對該圈子的文化不熟悉。但我想之所以我們會相信,多少也因為身邊有著太多的流言蜚語。當任何一個網美或網美的關係人,向你說些該圈子的羶色八卦時,通常的情況是傳播關係鏈上每多一個人,正如媒體本質,就會加油添醋一番。富二代男友送了一杯CITY CAFE給女友網美,經過一傳十、十傳百的加料後,就變成了土豪用北宋汝窯,裝了西王母瑤池玉露來送給網美,然後一番天雷勾動地火下,成就了一樁多人運動的美事。是,我認為謠言可畏。這些謠言之所以存在,多半是因為我們不會公開談論這些事情的真偽。久而久之,只有那些辛辣的要素被保留下來,又或者被新創造了出來。而我們最後也根據這些謠言,構築了我們對於這些網美世界的想像。對,我相信有網美將賣淫當作主要收入,但七成還是太誇張了。除非「賣淫」的定義很廣,廣到連收禮物、請吃飯、一起出遊,都能算是賣淫的定義中,不然我認為這種身價的女人,不可能還是一手交錢一手開腿。我認為橫綱凱咪敢於公開爆料此事,有著不容易的勇氣,也肯定承受了不小的壓力。雖然我不見得讚同她所說的「七成」,但她其中討論到的「沉淪」,倒是我親眼所見某個朋友的經歷。我記得十多年前,有個漂亮的朋友。她那時初嘗美貌所帶來的紅利,不管追求者的禮物,星巴克紙杯上的關心,甚至是小吃攤老闆招待的嘴邊肉等。某天,她就踏入了那時利潤還很豐厚的「Show Girl圈」。當時台灣展覽需求暴增,她接了大量的工作,從一開始的電玩、動漫,到後來的3C、工業、車展等等。那時我只感覺這名朋友好像開始走得很遠,遠到我再也不認識這個人。這幾年在臉書的朋友上,我看到了她。老實說,大概是因為接受了太多整形的調整,我已經無法在她與她朋友們的合照中認出她是哪一位。甚至過往單純而清新的美貌也已然逝去,取而代之的是滿滿的風塵味。我翻了翻她過往的照片,就是標準的在國外拍照打卡,在泳池畔與其他姊妹們的合照,再不然就是瞎拚的戰利品,唯獨欠缺的就是感情生活。這種女人的臉書和生命中,似乎從未有過一段感情,她們的照片中不會有男人,也不曾公開聽說她與哪位男性交往。而看著她曾經經營的臉書專頁上,還停留在當年還在Show Girl時的紀錄、活動和照片。我經常會想,她是否還認得過去的自己?又或者她是否還願意承認那段過往?

梁爵 said...

(錢不是萬能的,但沒有錢萬萬不能) 酒店兼差可以現領
高薪夢想專案:每週3天班以上【1節190元(時薪1140元)】 【1節200元(時薪1200)】
下午:3點班、4點班、5點班、6點班 (每個班次往後推7小時,就是妳的上班時間)
晚間:7點班、8點班、9點班 (每個班次往後推7小時,就是妳的上班時間)
不敢來酒店上班-酒店打工的原因酒店公關酒店小姐酒店出場:酒店小姐 酒店公關要出場接S嗎?
【酒店小姐】【酒店公關】 (出場)台北市任何一家酒店,單純出場一定要出去。
註:有床的地方不能去 汽車旅館/飯店,包括私人辦公室!。不用擔心得罪客人,也不用怕被扣錢! 當下可立即離開~ 切記先保護自己。
酒店小姐出場接S 純屬個人行為。有些人想賺這個錢….但有些酒店小姐認為不需要!
但是不會有任何人去逼你 為難做自己不喜歡的事。
我梁曉尊舉個例子 女孩們會覺得更貼切 也比較淺顯易懂的邏輯 :
八大行業商品是(人),今天(妳)面前站3個人有~ 王陽明 康康 NONO
(妳)肯定會問 王陽明 可不可以出場接S ?!
至於王陽明是否同意 決定在於自己~。